
What We Can Know
- A NEW YORK TIMES NOTABLE BOOK
- NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER
What We Can Know by Ian McEwan is one of 2026's most credible books, appearing on 2 of the year's most respected lists, including The Economist, The Guardian, for a Consensus Score of 34 out of 100.
Appears on these lists
Our take
AI-draftedSet in 2119 after climate and nuclear disasters McEwan calls the Derangement, the novel turns on a scholar trying to recover the text of a celebrated lost poem, written decades earlier for a poet's wife's birthday, and in doing so runs into the limits of what the historical record can actually tell anyone. It's McEwan revisiting territory from Atonement, but stripped of that novel's irony, since the catastrophe his characters once joked about elsewhere has now simply happened. The opening stretch is slow going, heavy with world-building, before a run of late reversals sharpens the book considerably. The result reads as a culmination of his long preoccupation with unreliable knowledge rather than a new direction.
In the press
“It's the best thing McEwan has written in ages. It's a sophisticated entertainment of a high order”
Dwight Garner, The New York Times“The book's value lies in what it is prepared to omit – a classically realist virtue”
Kevin Power, The Guardian
How the Consensus Score is calculated
Our Consensus Score is our own transparent editorial metric — not a user rating. It weighs each list by the credibility of its source, how recent the listing is, and any award status. Here is the full breakdown.
| Source | Authority | Recency | Award | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Economist | 0.95 | 0.85 | 1.00× | 0.81 |
| The Guardian | 0.85 | 0.85 | 1.00× | 0.72 |
| Weighted sum → Score | 1.53 → 34 | |||
Similar consensus books
Because they appear on some of the same lists.
Frequently asked
What lists is What We Can Know on?
What We Can Know appears on 2 lists in our 2026 corpus, including The Economist, The Guardian.
What is its Consensus Score?
What We Can Know has a Consensus Score of 34 out of 100, our transparent editorial measure of how many credible lists agree on it.



