
More and More and More
More and More and More by Jean-Baptiste Fressoz is one of 2026's most credible books, appearing on 1 of the year's most respected lists, including The Economist, for a Consensus Score of 15 out of 100.
Appears on these lists
Our take
AI-draftedFressoz's central move is to dismantle the idea of an "energy transition" as a historical pattern at all. Rather than coal replacing wood, and oil replacing coal, he documents how each new energy source has piled onto the last — global wood consumption, for instance, is higher today than in 1800, even after coal and oil arrived. Reviewers have highlighted his use of granular, sometimes startling data (whaling, tallow, colonial timber extraction) to unsettle the comforting narrative that humanity has smoothly upgraded its power sources over time. The book's implicit challenge to current decarbonization rhetoric is what gives it teeth: if past "transitions" were really additions, the assumption that renewables will simply displace fossil fuels rather than stack on top of them deserves far more scrutiny than it usually gets.
In the press
“A necessary, eye-opening and frequently gobsmacking book”
The Economist“This eye-opening book shows our understanding of past transitions is delusional”
Pilita Clark, Financial Times
How the Consensus Score is calculated
Our Consensus Score is our own transparent editorial metric — not a user rating. It weighs each list by the credibility of its source, how recent the listing is, and any award status. Here is the full breakdown.
| Source | Authority | Recency | Award | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Economist | 0.95 | 0.70 | 1.00× | 0.67 |
| Weighted sum → Score | 0.67 → 15 | |||
Similar consensus books
Because they appear on some of the same lists.
Frequently asked
What lists is More and More and More on?
More and More and More appears on 1 list in our 2026 corpus, including The Economist.
What is its Consensus Score?
More and More and More has a Consensus Score of 15 out of 100, our transparent editorial measure of how many credible lists agree on it.



