
Right Kind of Wrong
Right Kind of Wrong by Amy Edmondson is one of 2026's most credible books, appearing on 1 of the year's most respected lists, including Bloomberg, for a Consensus Score of 12 out of 100.
Appears on these lists
Our take
AI-draftedEdmondson's contribution is a taxonomy, not a slogan: basic, complex, and intelligent failure are distinguished by cause rather than outcome, which is what separates this from the usual fail-fast rah-rah. The book works best when she's dissecting specific case studies where the mechanism of failure is traceable and the lesson is concrete rather than aspirational. It gets denser in the middle stretch, jumping between psychological safety research and organizational behavior in ways that ask more patience than the opening chapters promise. Still, the framework itself is genuinely useful for distinguishing failures worth learning from versus failures that were simply avoidable carelessness.
How the Consensus Score is calculated
Our Consensus Score is our own transparent editorial metric — not a user rating. It weighs each list by the credibility of its source, how recent the listing is, and any award status. Here is the full breakdown.
| Source | Authority | Recency | Award | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bloomberg | 0.80 | 0.70 | 1.00× | 0.56 |
| Weighted sum → Score | 0.56 → 12 | |||
Similar consensus books
Because they appear on some of the same lists.
Frequently asked
What lists is Right Kind of Wrong on?
Right Kind of Wrong appears on 1 list in our 2026 corpus, including Bloomberg.
What is its Consensus Score?
Right Kind of Wrong has a Consensus Score of 12 out of 100, our transparent editorial measure of how many credible lists agree on it.



